I’ve wondered this myself. Not EL level. However, I can't hand hold them more then a few seconds before the image becomes too jittery for me to want to keep looking through them. Contrast and resolution in both is so good that they are beyond relevance for visual observations. You currently have javascript disabled. anymore. Both of these fine binoculars are excellent performers and each has some advantages and disadvantages vis-a-vis the other. I wish I could comment about the 12x50. Also Swaro SLC 8x42, 10x42, 12x50 and 15x56. ASCOM driver for APT filter wheel control available? Mounted it would be brilliant. I don't personally know the Swaro 12x50 but OTOH own the EL8x32 Swarovision which I highly esteem, and this also concerning its edge-sharpness. But if I were going the Vortex route, I would definitely own it. Could see it being very popular and selling well for multiple purposes. Page 1 of all the Swarovski Binoculars fully reviewed in the Best Binoculars & Reviews Database . Hand-held, I still think it would lose out to the Canon 15x50 IS, simply because it doesn't have image stabilisation. Something to consider if you envisage handheld usage. Swarovski EL’s run $2629, and the SLC’s $1799. The 15x56s are the easier to hand hold of any 15x binocular that I've ever tried. I went shooting once with the western field rep of Swarovski and I asked him about the new EL's and whether I should trade my SLC's in on the new model. Any comments? Mark9473 and … It's THAT important at 15x. Both binos have about the same FOV. To make a fair comparison we need to understand the differences between the EL’s and SLC’s. *FREE OUTDOORSMANS SWAROVSKI EL STUD & INSTALL W/ PURCHASE* ($89.99 Value) The Ultimate Balance. If you do elect to try a pair of the 15x56s make sure that you purchase them from a vendor who will allow you to return them (with a reasonable period of time) in the event that you find that you can't hand hold them steady enough to make them enjoyable/productive enough to use. At night, I prefer the SLC. The Meopta 15x56 would be a bit behind both of these. It is Swarovski’s fluoride-containing glass. I use it almost every day. If we tried to add up the millions of previousl After reading as much info as I could get my hands on, it seemed like there were so many opinions out there that I needed to do a comparative analysis myself to decide. In this video, Trail goes over which size harnesses best fit the Swarovski SLC 15x56. Mounted, I would clearly go for the SLC which, as has been pointed out, may reach just a bit deeper than the EL and is a wonderful astro binocular (and so is, no doubt, the EL SV). SLC 15x56 binoculars are the expert for observing over long distances. On Bird Forum, Patriot222 also provided an interesting field comparison of the SLC HD 15x56 to the EL SV 12x50. 12 power - EL 12x50 > UHD 12x50 - the UHD feels similar to the HD model, slightly better. https://www.muleycrazy.com/1556-swarovskislc-1250-swarovskiel.html The SLC 15x56 is definitely the winner for astronomy, it goes much deeper than the 12x50 without isolating the object from its surroundings (unlike the Canons and the heavy, mounted binoculars), just the best handheld binocular for astronomy right now. Swarovski EL42 10x42 Binocular with FieldPro Package - 34210. A friend of mine has the SLC 15x56, the edge-sharpness of which was quite disappointing to me => Far less impressive than the one of the mentioned Swaroviosion 8x32... IMO, SV is a very substantial evolutionary step over SLC. Here's a nice review I found useful as I took a deep breath and grit my long teeth about adding the 15x56 to my collection. It is interesting because the SLC 15x56 is reknown to be nearly flat field, so where do you consider the sweet spot to deteriorate from the centre of the FOV? The question is…  Is the brightness and clarity of the Swarovski EL 12x50’s enough to compensate for the extra magnification of the Swarovski SLC 15x56? $830 is a lot of cash to pony up for the upgrade to the EL’s. For reference, my sole purpose for these binoculars is hunting out w… Vortex Optics Razor UHD Binoculars 12x50. 12x50; Swarovski EL Swarovision Warranty • The ELs carry a lifetime warranty on the optical system when purchased by US residents from an authorized Swarovski Optik North American dealer. What is the difference in clarity, contrast and resolution between the two models? So the 15x bino actually loses much of its advantage over a 12x bino when used handheld. You can choose to either mount it or use it handheld, that's the beauty of a 15x56 unlike bigger and heavier binos, but of course you will get the most out if it once mounted, I agree with that. Swarovski 8x30WB SLC Review Swarovski 10x30 CL Companion (Field Pro) Review Swarovski 10x40 Habicht Review Swarovski 10x42 SLC HD Review Swarovski 8x42 NL Pure Review Swarovski 12x42 NL Pure Review Swarovski 10x42 EL Swarovision Review Swarovski 10x50 EL Review Swarovski 12x50 EL Review Swarovski 10x56 SLC HD Review Swarovski 15x56 SLC Neu Review … Finding a proper bino harness fit can be difficult. The EL’s are furnished with Swarovski’s highest quality glass. Then there is a layer of Swarotop, which is an anti-reflection coating that significantly enhances light transmission. Then I got old. I have owned 3 Razors, 8x42, 10x42, 12x50. For a 12x bino, it is about 62 % compared with using it mounted on a tripod, for a 15x binos it is about 57% (see Yoder/Vukobratovich, Field Guide to Binoulars and Scopes, p. 53). I picked up a pair of both binoculars in the 10×42’s and started testing. This quest has led to a healthy debate about a couple of the best binoculars on the market. Their 15x magnification and optimized optics, combined with outstanding edge-to-edge sharpness allow you to see special moments, even over expansive areas. I second all the good things people said for the 15x56. Ingrese al mundo mágico de Swarovski: joyas refinadas, relojes elegantes y brillantes Decoraciones de cristal celebran la artesanía tradicional de la marca. The SLC 15x56 HD are going to be great and going to be a bit large for all around use but they absolutely give you an edge when stretching binos to the max. It seems to be a constant search for the lightest, clearest, and most durable. Indeed if you take two examples from the same manufacturer and series, say for example the outstanding Maven B5 18x56 binocularsand the 15x56 version, they use exactly the same housing and exterior armor and thus have identical dimensions: 8.2in (20.8cm) x 6.1in (15.5cm) x 2.5in (6.4cm). DSLR, Mirrorless & General-Purpose Digital Camera DSO Imaging, Community Forum Software by IP.BoardLicensed to: Cloudy Nights, This is not recommended for shared computers, Petition to stop mega-constellations of satellites, Voltage and current output of dummy battery for T7i. I have access to the SLC and SLC HD 15’s and would not buy it over the SLC HD 15’s personally. in … I am curious which will be better for handheld astronomy - SV 12x50 or SLC 15x56 HD. Add to Cart Add to Cart Add to Cart Add to Cart I own several models, including the very good 10x42, and like them, particularly for daytime use. But at 12x I doubt that the image will be easy to observe as it will bounce around a fair bit, even at 12x. ... Swarovski 12x50 EL Binoculars FieldPro 35212 Brand New AUCTION NO RESERVE. Please re-enable javascript to access full functionality. Makes out details a long distance away. Nature lovers appreciate the unique close-up setting of 3.3 m and the rapid, precise focusing mechanism. In this video, Trail goes over the differences, price point, and use cases of the Swaro EL and SLC 10x42 Binocular. What do you guys recommend. See if Maven has closed the performance vs. price gap. The SV 12x50 wins by quality of the optics, workmanship and design, the SLC 15x56 wins by price, magnification, aperture and light throughput of the prisms. Site Navigation ... Swarovski SLC 15x56 HD Binoculars Review. The El 12x50 Swarovision are to me the ultimate bino if you could only have one. this is a case when one really needs to go somewhere with both, and try them out first hand. When 10x is too wide and 15x is too long, a 12x binocular made with the clearest, most spectacular glass on the planet is the perfect bridge between magnification and FOV. The SLC may have a slight advantage in transmission due to its A-K prisms (the EL has S-P), but that is not huge. Is it worth spending the extra money for the Swarovski SLC binoculars over the Vortex Razors HD’s? So.. is it worth it? Horses for courses. SWAROVSKI Optik 15x56 SLC Series Water Proof Roof Prism Binocular with 4.5 Degree Angle of View, Green. The SLC 15x56 is definitely the winner for astronomy, it goes much deeper than the 12x50 without isolating the object from its surroundings (unlike the Canons and the heavy, mounted binoculars), just the best handheld binocular for astronomy right now. I also have the Swarovski 15x56 SLC Neu, and it is very good, and from what I know it is. see the thread ‘swarovski 15x56 HD vs 12x50 SV fieldpro’ again in the Swarovski sub-forum, with the last post in September 2017 The Canons would of course be a good alternative for handheld use. The SLC 10x42 HD are light and a great option. For me the 12x50s were significantly easier for me to hand hold than the 15x56s were. Upland Optics Perception HD 10x42mm Hunting Binoculars. Size Assuming that you are comparing the same type of instrument (roof & Porro prism) then because they both use the same diameter objective lenses, both 15x56 and 18x56 binoculars will have similar dimensions. The Swarovski SLC 15x56 W B is designed to facilitate hand-held viewing; however, most folks will do well to mount it — especially for astronomy. ​For those of us who are muley crazy, there seems to be a never-ending desire to gain an edge over the mythical giants we chase. Many thanks for the great posts and useful experience! Therefore, I'm almost sure I would prefer SV 12x50 over SLC 15x56. I would not xconsider the SLC 15x56 HD on anything other then a tripod or monopod at the least. these are both very, very good instruments (I don‘t have the EL 12x50, but do own both the 10x50 EL SV and the SLC 15x56). Our standards are high, and we seek the best. My current collection of swarovski binoculars is... 8x32 el sv 10x42 El sv 15x56 slc HD As hard as it is for me to say this I am happy with what I have. Try them for yourself to see which suits you better for your type of observing under your conditions. I haven't tried the SLC 15x56. For handheld use, also keep in mind that handheld binocular efficiency decreases with magnification. For warranty service, a copy of your receipt from an authorized dealer is required. The SLC is 20% heavier than the EL and also larger. If you are looking at only Swarovski. Even though this is likely a “money no object” comparison, it matters. A friend of mine has the SLC 15x56, the edge-sharpness of which was quite disappointing to me. The first coating is Swarobright, which is a Dielectric Prism Coating designed to enhance color presentation. The EL’s are coated with four coatings. I am looking to add larger binoculars to my arsenal and I would like some opinions regarding the Swarovski 12x50 EL with swarovision vs the 15x56 SLC. I only use mine with a mount so the fact that I can't hand hold them steady for very long when hand held is not a problem for me. a step behind the new SLC 15x56 HD. They are more $$, however the Swarovski units are markedly better for detecting detail, color and yes, even vapor trail. I'm sure the new offerings are fantastic but at 56 years of age I can finally say I'm done chasing the holy grail of binoculars. They are multipurpose and reliable, suitable for use both during the day and at twilight. I can truly live with what I have and be happy with it. Having done stargazing with 7,8, 10, 12 and 15x binoculars, I have come to the conclusion that 15x takes you to the next level, DSOs show their shape, the planets are no longer ridiculously small, the Moon is so detailed that you can spend an evening observing it, it's not just a matter of "oh it's nice!" Until a few years ago, I did a lot of hand-held observing with my three other 15x bins. The EL SV 12x50 is a top of the table astronomy binocular, no problems hand-holding it, ticks all the boxes, second only to the Fuji 10x50 in terms of edge sharpness AND negligible chromatic aberration, and VERY light. What about the SLC   10 x 56 vs 15x 56 for handheld and deep sky. 5 out of 5 stars (5) Total Ratings 5, $2,349.00 New. Trail goes over the Swarovski 15x56 binos in this video and what it has to offer, plus if it's worth the money. Swarovski 10x50 EL Binocular SWA35210. However, since you're indicated that you primarily plan to use these binoculars in hand hold-able mode then I then I strongly recommend that you get the 12x50s rather than the 15x56s. Swarovski 58291 SLC 15x56 Binocular - Green. As you stipulate "handheld" then the SV 12x50. Jones-Emberson 1(PK 164+31.1) Headphone Nebula, Mark9473, Stellarfire and M&P805 like this. Robby puts the new Maven B5 15x56 against his trusty Swarovski SLC 15x56. Several functions may not work. That said, the 12x50s are still a challenge and that's one of the reasons why I now just use a pair of 10x50s as my highest power "hand hold-able". I currently carry 10x42's and an 80 mm spotter. The goal of purchasing the 12x50 would be to eliminate the need to carry 2 optics. But I never use it handheld. The 12x50s are smaller in size, lighter in weight, ergonomically more comfortable to hand hold, and their lower power makes them substantially easier to hand hold for longer periods of time than the 15x56s are. He said that for what I do (hunt dang near everything all year long) I should get the Swaro bright coated SLC's because they have a stronger hinge and a better focus wheel. Take the Leica 10x and spotter, take the 10x and a 15x56, or just take a 12x50 EL (with outdoorsman stud) While the 15x56 may be a game changer, it would not save me any weight in my pack as it weighs about the same as the spotter. EL 42 THE IMPRESSIVE, MULTIPURPOSE BINOCULARS EL 42 binoculars combine size, weight, and optical performance to give the perfect product. This combo works well most of the time but I find … The Zeiss Conquest 15x56 HD, is. If you want 12x and 15x handheld then consider the canon IS range, they at least remain stable, impressively so. Sorry, my funds are limited. I know this is less informative than a direct comparison 12x50 versus 15x56 would be,  but just my two p. Edited by Fomalhaut, 28 September 2017 - 01:50 PM. I use the 15's much more often than the Swaro spotter.
Popeyes Commercial Guy, Little Princess Piggy Bank, Light Sport Aircraft Cost, How To Treat Dog Wounds, Overseas Security Jobs For Ex-military, Flower Child Nutritional Information Mac And Cheese, Prince Poppycock Final Performance,